Keyboard Shortcuts?f

×
  • →Next step
  • ←Previous step
  • ↓Skip this slide
  • ↑Previous slide
  • mShow slide thumbnails
  • nShow notes
  • hShow handout latex source
  • NShow talk notes latex source
There is further, alternative motivation for considering team reasoning. Some have claimed that it will provide us with a ground-level account of shared intention, and thereby of shared agency ...
 
‘The key difference between the two kinds of intention is not a property of the intentions themselves, but of the modes of reasoning by which they are formed.
(Gold \& Sugden, 2007)
 
So these researchers, unlike Pettit and List are aiming to capture a basic form of shared agency rather than to build on a prior account of shared intention. But there’s more ...
 
--------
\subsection{slide-8}
‘collective intentions are the product of a distinctive mode of practical reasoning, team reasoning, in which agency is attributed to groups.’
(Gold \& Sugden, 2007)
 
--------
\subsection{slide-9}
So these researchers are aiming to build a kind of aggregate subject.
 
They think, in a nutshell, that aggregate subjects are not only a consequence of self-reflection, but can also arise through (a special mode of) reasoning about what to do.
 
--------
\subsection{slide-10}
But what is team reasoning? I’m so glad you asked ...
 
--------
\subsection{slide-11}
‘somebody team reasons if she works out the best possible feasible combination of actions for all the members of her team, then does her part in it.’
(Bacharach, 2006, p. 121)
 
--------
\subsection{slide-12}
These are the questions you would want to answer if you were going to pursue team reasoning.
 
‘The key difference between the two kinds of intention is not a property of the intentions themselves, but of the modes of reasoning by which they are formed.
(Gold \& Sugden, 2007)
 
‘collective intentions are the product of a distinctive mode of practical reasoning, team reasoning, in which agency is attributed to groups.’
(Gold \& Sugden, 2007)
 
‘somebody team reasons if she works out the best possible feasible combination of actions for all the members of her team, then does her part in it.’
(Bacharach, 2006, p. 121)
 

Click here and press the right key for the next slide.

(This may not work on mobile or ipad. You can try using chrome or firefox, but even that may fail. Sorry.)