Keyboard Shortcuts?f

×
  • →Next step
  • ←Previous step
  • ↓Skip this slide
  • ↑Previous slide
  • mShow slide thumbnails
  • tShow transcript (+SHIFT = all transcript)
  • nShow notes (+SHIFT = all notes)

Please be cautious in using the transcripts.

They were created mechanically and have mostly not been checked or revised.

Here is how they were created:

  1. live lecture recorded;
  2. machine transcription of live recording;
  3. ask LLM to clean up transcript, and link to individual slides.

This is an error-prone process.

Click here and press the right key for the next slide.

(This may not work on mobile or ipad. You can try using chrome or firefox, but even that may fail. Sorry.)

also ...

Press the left key to go backwards (or swipe right)

Press n to toggle whether notes are shown (or add '?notes' to the url before the #)

Press m or double tap to slide thumbnails (menu)

Press ? at any time to show the keyboard shortcuts

 

Conclusion

conclusion

In conclusion, ...
insert-transcript#e3b5fc76-43f1-4422-8aa0-635d9679c653-here
Important to distinguish the three strategies
which types of subject can have intentions? individual only also plural how is there shared ? intention reductive aggregate
Today we have been mostly interested in a version of the aggregate strategy.
insert-transcript#cbd2a232-40a4-409f-82d3-4ba0d7720440-here
Nice side-effect: we have seen how there can be aggregate subjects.

How?

aggregate subject

insert-transcript#40df7a53-fbfb-4f3b-8aae-6edec0d44a9b-here
individual reasoning team reasoning decision decision intention shared intention
insert-transcript#2aa13c59-5b4d-43fa-a1d9-cb9103131273-here
problem of action problem of joint action we don't need shared intention we do need shared intention Bratman's planning theory Pacherie's team reason- ing theory ??? } } decision theory game theory limits -- hi-lo, prsnr's dlmma team reasoning
Maybe we need to take a step back ...